There’s something oddly comforting about watching a company throw $2 billion at a problem it still doesn’t understand. Viasat’s new “super satellite” is being paraded around like a weapon in the great orbital showdown, the one where Elon Musk already owns the battlefield, the supply lines, and half the spectators.
Bloomberg, in its usual gentle hospice tone, calls this a “counteroffensive.” That’s adorable. A counteroffensive implies momentum. What Viasat actually has is altitude, thirty-six thousand kilometers of it, and that’s the problem.
The marketing line is simple: a single satellite that can pump out “close to one terabit per second.” To the uninitiated, that sounds like the Internet’s second coming. But anyone who’s ever streamed a video on a plane knows what that really means: throttled speeds, buffering, and a polite apology from the flight attendant. Viasat’s CEO, Mark Dankberg, tells Bloomberg that latency “isn’t that bad,” <coffee snort warning> comparing it to live cable interviews. That’s a man selling DSL in the age of fiber.
The company insists it can “aim beams” toward areas of high demand. Cute idea, but it’s like bragging that your rotary phone has speed dial. Starlink has already blanketed the sky with low-Earth orbit satellites that dynamically reroute in real time. Viasat’s system can “redirect beams,” sure, but those beams still travel 70,000 kilometers round trip before they hit your airplane Wi-Fi. The only thing agile about that is the PR team that has to explain it.
Boeing’s name makes an appearance too, as the proud maker of the satellite bus. That should comfort investors in the same way hearing “built by Boeing” comforts nervous flyers. Both companies are locked in the same nostalgia loop: build big, charge big, pretend size equals innovation. It’s the aerospace version of a midlife crisis sports car: admired only by other men going through the same crisis.
Meanwhile, Starlink isn’t slowing down. It’s picking up airline partners like a child collecting stickers: Alaska Airlines, Air France, United, Virgin Atlantic, and likely more by the time Viasat’s satellite actually wakes up. Amazon’s Project Kuiper, which hasn’t even started commercial operations, already poached JetBlue. Viasat’s response? A promise that “next year’s” satellite will fix everything. Translation: please don’t sell our stock yet.
Bloomberg’s piece glosses over the most inconvenient part: Viasat’s entire model depends on scarcity. Dankberg even says it himself: “Bandwidth is what we sell.” In other words, they make money because there isn’t enough of it. Starlink, Kuiper, and even the overeager folks at AST SpaceMobile are building systems designed to make bandwidth abundant. That’s extinction pressure.
Speaking of AST, the article pivots to them halfway through, like a nervous journalist trying to change the subject at a funeral. Their stock tripled and they signed a deal with Verizon. At least they’re moving. Viasat’s big announcement feels like a PowerPoint presentation that started three years too late. Old space is still giving interviews. New space is giving service.
There’s an almost tragic optimism in the way Bloomberg closes. The journalist gives Dankberg the last word about “congestion” eventually hurting Starlink. It’s the kind of statement only someone clinging to an exit strategy could make. Congestion might slow down LEO networks, but latency never changes for GEO, it’s physics, not competition. You can’t innovate your way out of the speed of light.
If Viasat’s new satellite works as promised, it will double their bandwidth capacity. Impressive, if you ignore the fact that Starlink adds roughly that much capacity every time it launches another batch of satellites (which it does weekly). Viasat’s one big bird is a monument to the past, a gleaming orbital antique. They’re calling it progress, but what they’ve really launched is a $2 billion time capsule.
So yes, Bloomberg calls it a “fight back.” But the truth is simpler.
Viasat isn’t fighting Starlink.
It’s fighting physics, cash flow, and the clock.
And all three are undefeated.
SES: Sovereignty With Stock Tickers